Tuesday, August 05, 2008

We need education vouchers here - now

ACT wants education vouchers made available in New Zealand. It will push this policy hard if it holds the balance of power after the election. And before the purists out there start attacking the policy again, I know it's not perfect, but it is a big step in the right direction and there are thousands of NZ parents right now breaking their backs (or hearts) over the state monopolising secondary education.

Here is an update on how the voucher system has changed education in Sweden;

Big Change for Welfarist Sweden: School Choice

By MALIN RISING
The Associated Press
Saturday, July 26, 2008; 11:31 AM

STOCKHOLM, Sweden -- Schools run by private enterprise? Free iPods and laptop computers to attract students?

It may sound out of place in Sweden, that paragon of taxpayer-funded cradle-to-grave welfare. But a sweeping reform of the school system has survived the critics and 16 years later is spreading and attracting interest abroad.

"I think most people, parents and children, appreciate the choice," said Bertil Ostberg, from the Ministry of Education. "You can decide what school you want to attend and that appeals to people."

Since the change was introduced in 1992 by a center-right government that briefly replaced the long-governing Social Democrats, the numbers have shot up. In 1992, 1.7 percent of high schoolers and 1 percent of elementary schoolchildren were privately educated. Now the figures are 17 percent and 9 percent.

In some ways the trend mirrors the rise of the voucher system in the U.S., with all its pros and cons. But while the percentage of children in U.S. private schools has dropped slightly in recent years, signs are that the trend in Sweden is growing.

Before the reform, most families depended on state-run schools following a uniform national curriculum. Now they can turn to the "friskolor," or "independent schools," which choose their own teaching methods and staff, and manage their own buildings.

They remain completely government-financed and are not allowed to charge tuition fees. The difference is that their government funding goes to private companies which then try to run the schools more cost-effectively and keep whatever taxpayer money they save.

Bure Equity, listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange, is the largest private school operator in Sweden and is expanding rapidly. In the first quarter of this year, net profit for its education portfolio rose 33 percent to $3 million.

Such profit-making troubles Swedes who don't think taxpayers should be enriching corporations.

The Social Democrats strongly opposed the change as anti-egalitarian, but when they were re-elected to power in 1994, they found it was so popular that they left it in place, though they imposed a lid on fees.

Barbro Lillkaas, a 40-year-old accountant, is considering putting her child in a private school, and has no problem with the profit motive.

"If you run a good operation then you make a profit. But you won't get any students if you are bad," she said. "You have to do a good job to get money; that is even more important for a private school."

4 comments:

Will de Cleene said...

What do Swedish teachers think of the system? Surely the levels of ptofessionalism and diversity is strengthened by school choice? One way to defuse the PPTA etc in NZ would be to demonstrate that the teachers aren't demonised under the voucher system.

If you could contrast the benefits of the voucher/scholarship system to the current NZ regulation and compliance heavy centralised education system, you might very well mobilise one of Labour's most devoted advocates to your side.

Anonymous said...

And if we had the ACT Education Policy in NZ no child would be left behind because of where their parents live or their financial position. Education would become about children, not bureaucrats. Parents could send their children to the school of their choice. After all, it is their money and their future. Opportunities open to teachers would increase massively.

Anonymous said...

It will push this policy hard if it holds the balance of power after the election.

Right! So that's more like it. Here's one of the 20 or so points that ACT will actually fight for.


They remain completely government-financed and are not allowed to charge tuition fees.


but that's NOT ACT's model? Is it? Is it???

Parents could send their children to the school of their choice. After all, it is their money

Umm no, it's still my f**king money!!

One way to defuse the PPTA etc in NZ

The only way to destory the PPTA, PSA, EMPU, and all the rest is simply to ban them. Outright.

Anonymous said...

Most interesting, Lindsay. Thanks for that post. I wasn't aware that the policy had been introduced so long ago.

Grinned at the 'purist' bit .. I put my hand up to that .. but whereas I'll acknowledge that it's an improvement on the current set-up - and I've always believed in supporting those who move twd privatisation/freedom, no matter the issue - I have always been extremely suspicious of still having the state at the core.

1. How would you counter, or deal with, the anticipated strong opposition from those dedicated marxists?

2. How would you ensure that they didn't deliberately poison the waters?

I'm genuinely interested.